Decision 16573
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 16573 | Walsh | English | 1989-05-19 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
labour dispute | loss of employment | casual employees |
Summary:
According to company, all casuals would have been working the week of 20 to 26-7 but for the strike. Claimant's last day of work is 22-7. There would have been work for the rest of the week at least. Nothing perverse in Board's decision.