| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
on leave |
|
Summary:
Workers laid off 2-8 for 2 weeks (until 16-8) when mill closed for annual vacation. 5 maintenance workers called on 18-8 but would not cross a picket line. Claimant was not involved in repair work but was not called due to strike. Disentitled as of 19-8.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
attributable to dispute |
|
Summary:
Stoppage of work commenced 19-8. In the present case, it is irrelevant whether a continuing fire hazard would have prevented reopening in any event since the primary cause was repairs not done due to picketing. Proof of fire hazard inconclusive in any event.
