Decision 16555
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16555 | Walsh | English | 1989-05-12 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| labour dispute | loss of employment | while claiming ui |
Summary:
Claimant had been on the job for 5 days only when lockout took place. While one can sympathize with him who took the job when sent to it by his union, even knowing it might be of short duration due to the dispute rather than perhaps being disqualified, appeal dismissed.