Decision 16121
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 16121 | Muldoon | English | 1989-01-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allowed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| penalties | rationale |
Summary:
The penalty evinces a 2-fold purpose and function. It constitutes a rebuke and denunciation of a claimant who plays fast or loose with UI system and a deterrent to others; and, secondly, a small way to compensate CEIC and public for expenses of handlingthe claims.