| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
dereliction of duty |
|
|
Summary:
As a result of claimant's wilfully incorrect work, the inspection line had to be stopped, i.e. he deliberately interfered with production work. He says he attempted to test the inspector of his work to discover the person who was sabotaging his work. Reduced to 4 weeks.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| misconduct |
duration of disqualification |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant's misconduct was serious enough but not so bad as the worst imaginable for which the maximum disqualification is reserved, for that is the case for which Parliament legislates maxima. Reduced to 4 weeks.
