Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
restrictions |
or preferences |
|
Summary:
For example, if the Board felt that the claimant merely had a preference for teaching positions as opposed to a real job restriction, then the claimant is not considered unavailable for work.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
As long as UI was being received she had every right to believe that she was entitled to continue to search for work in that field alone. She was disentitled just 5 days after she was notified to broaden her job search. She should have been given 5 weeks after the warning.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
availability for work |
restrictions |
reasonable period of time |
|
Summary:
Claimant has had a very generous number of weeks to find work in teaching. She received 29 weeks when the norm is 12 to 15 weeks but she was not given a warning she had to broaden her job search. Period of time extended by an additional 5 weeks.