Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
hearings |
by telephone |
|
Summary:
The hearing reconvened on 27-8-86. Both hearings were conducted by telephone. I consider that this procedure of conducting hearings by telephone is far from satisfactory and should not be followed, barring exceptional circumstances.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
in kind |
|
Summary:
Oral contract with employer in return for free accommodation shared by her and husband. Reg. 57(6)(d) quoted. There is no question in my mind that the Commission was justified in making the assessment it did for the value of the rent-free apartment accommodation.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
earnings |
income |
between spouses |
|
Summary:
Claimant was the party with whom the agreement for janitorial work had been made. It was her responsibility alone to ensure that work was done. Work done by husband. She was the person on whom the employer relied. It was claimant who was employed and inreceipt of monies.