Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Summary:
The Board did not address the proper issues. It found that claimant was engaged in operating a business and therefore was not unemployed. No attention given to whether activity minor in extent. I will therefore use s.96 to give my own decision.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
constitution of board |
member ineligible |
|
Summary:
The Board rendered a decision in claimant's absence. Claimant then sought to appear. Same Board reconvened. A different Board should have heard the appeal, otherwise an apprehension of bias certainly exists. This was not a rehearing to clarify some point of evidence.