| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
labour market information |
|
Summary:
According to the insured, the simple opinion of an employment counsellor has little conclusive value; CEIC should provide statistics or more substantive evidence. Untenable argument. After 7 months of job seeking, if he has done so, the insured is capable of realizing this. [p. 3]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
job search |
warning before disentitlement |
|
Summary:
Argument presented: CEIC should warn the insured if job search is insufficient or if there are too many restrictions and give him the chance to change attitude. This is a misunderstanding of the law. Proof required from the insured according to 14(a). CEIC is under no obligation to encourage him to change.
