Decision 14750

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 14750   Denault  French 1988-02-10
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  earnings 

Summary:

On his report card of 12-5, the insured specified that he had started working on 19-5 whereas it was on 14-5. There is no doubt that he acted knowingly in responding to very simple questions. It is incumbent upon him to provide explanations. The need for money is not an excuse.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  proof 

Summary:

As in criminal matters, certain judges require the guilty intent or proof beyond all reasonable doubt; others require less since this legislation is of a social nature. I share the views of CUB-12220: evidence required is less than in criminal cases, therefore in accordance with weight of evidence.


Date modified: