Decision 14668
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 14668 | Strayer | English | 1988-01-14 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
basic concepts | qualifying period | extension | illness |
Summary:
Para.18(2)(a) must be construed to refer to the illness of a claimant. Illness of claimant's son does not qualify. Also, reg. 47(6) surely suggests physical incapability of a claimant. Para.18(2)(a) is therefore clarified.