| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
different occupation and lower wages |
|
|
Summary:
Claim filed 21-8-86; machine operator earning $225 a week, on 14-10-86, is offered employment as a babysitter at $100 a week. Not suitable. A delay of at least 3 months must be granted to find comparable employment.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| refusal of work |
moving |
|
|
Summary:
Claim filed on 21-8-86 and offer of employment on 14-10-86. Plans to move, having made an offer to purchase on 10-10-86. I fail to understand why the offer of purchase was not taken into account. If this is not valid grounds, what is it?
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
restrictions |
reasonable period of time |
|
Summary:
It is now well established that a reasonable delay must be granted to find suitable employment. In this case, at least 3 months should have been granted. The employment offered was not suitable: different type of work and enormous drop in pay.
