Decision 14236

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 14236   Rouleau  English 1987-10-13
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  conditions required for disentitlement 

Summary:

4 factors must be present for ss.44(1) to apply with burden of proof on the Commission: (1) a loss of employment; (2) as a result of a stoppage of work; (3) attributable to a labour dispute; and (4) stoppage and dispute must occur at claimant's premises.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  directly interested  own conditions at issue 

Summary:

Dispute over fish quality control. 32 walked out in the afternoon. Returned to work next day. All employees locked out including 68 workers and claimant who had not walked out. Direct interest found to exist as his working conditions could have been directly affected.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  loss of employment  by reason of a stoppage 

Summary:

Dispute over fish quality control. 32 walked out in the afternoon. Upon their return to work the next day, all employees locked out including 68 workers and claimant who had not walked out.


Date modified: