| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
loss of employment |
while claiming ui |
|
Summary:
He had worked at that part-time employment for 16 months. Earnings were reported on cards following lay-off from full-time employment. At the time the stoppage of work commenced this was the sole employment held by him and, therefore, he is clearly disentitled under 31(1).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
regularly engaged |
definition |
|
Summary:
The claimant worked 1 week and 4 hours for his previous employer. ABRAHAMS referred to. Here claimant has not established any fixed pattern of employment. He was on an "as required" basis. It cannot be said, therefore, that he has become regularly engaged. [p. 6-7]
Employment prior to the disentitlement [i.e. prior to the loss of employment giving rise to disentitlement] cannot be relied upon to fulfill this condition. [p._6]
