Decision 13664

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 13664   Joyal  French 1987-05-14
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  jurisdiction  adjournment of hearing 

Summary:

New facts presented at hearing. The board had jursidiction to adjourn the hearing to allow the Commission to resume its investigation. Rule 65 gives the chairman some latitude. The board would have erred if it had refused. [p. 7]


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  stoppage of work  existence 

Summary:

Not sufficient to say that loss of employment was attributable to the dispute; it must be by reason of a work stoppage attributable to the dispute. [p. 11] The lay-off of 25% of the work force, or 150 employees, because of a shortage of work [p. 3] does not mean a work stoppage. [p. 15]


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  jurisdiction  evidence new 

Summary:

New facts presented at hearing. The board had jursidiction to adjourn the hearing to allow the Commission to resume its investigation. Rule 65 gives the chairman some latitude. The board would have erred if it had refused. [p. 7]


Date modified: