Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
adjournment of hearing |
|
Summary:
New facts presented at hearing. The board had jursidiction to adjourn the hearing to allow the Commission to resume its investigation. Rule 65 gives the chairman some latitude. The board would have erred if it had refused. [p. 7]
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
existence |
|
Summary:
Not sufficient to say that loss of employment was attributable to the dispute; it must be by reason of a work stoppage attributable to the dispute. [p. 11] The lay-off of 25% of the work force, or 150 employees, because of a shortage of work [p. 3] does not mean a work stoppage. [p. 15]
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
jurisdiction |
evidence new |
|
Summary:
New facts presented at hearing. The board had jursidiction to adjourn the hearing to allow the Commission to resume its investigation. Rule 65 gives the chairman some latitude. The board would have erred if it had refused. [p. 7]