Decision 13126
Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Decision 13126 | Cullen | English | 1987-02-04 |
Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
---|---|---|---|
Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
---|---|---|---|
labour dispute | loss of employment | shortly after commencing |
Summary:
The claimant did not inform the Commission of his one-day work. This resulted in an overpayment. Hired as temporary. The fact that he returned to work after the strike clearly indicates that it was not a "token engagement" as mentioned in CUB 12753.