| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
wage-loss indemnity |
group plan |
|
Summary:
It is necessary for claimant to show that the plan meets all of the criteria in 57(4). Claimant only invoked one. I need not consider it as he has not shown that he meets any of the other criteria necessary for him to succeed.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
time limitation for recovery |
|
Summary:
Notice of overpayment sent to claimant 24-7-84. Matter heard by Umpire in 1988. The appeal could also have been dismissed on the ground that it has become moot, i.e. the decision could make no difference with respect to future recovery because the period of 3 years under ss._35(4) is expired.
