Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
antedate |
misinformation from Commission |
|
|
Summary:
The misinformation came from the CEIC itself and not from a third party. This situation can certainly be regarded as good cause since the cause itself is imputable to the CEIC's inefficiency rather than to claimant's negligence. He should not have to bear the CEIC's blunder.
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
antedate |
waiting for job |
searching for work |
|
Summary:
The Board put the emphasis on the positive results of claimant's search for employment rather than on the reasons for delay. Error of law. CUB 8126 referred to. Board's decision upheld by Umpire on another ground.