| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
proof |
|
|
Summary:
2 essential conditions: claimant must have been qualified on the prior day and good cause for delay must be shown to exist throughout the whole period. The onus of proving that both of these conditions have been met rests with claimant.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
rationale |
|
|
Summary:
Good cause is undefined by the legislation. Prompt filing is a basic requirement for proper administration. Undue delays not conducive to orderly operation. To abide by the requirements is an essential condition.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
expecting compensation payments |
|
|
Summary:
Injured his back. Not unreasonable for him to expect to receive union benefits. Pursued the matter and made numerous calls. Good cause shown for nearly 6 months.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
waiting for record of employment |
|
|
Summary:
Delay of 6 weeks: from 20-7 to 30-8. Difficulty in communicating in English. Employer took no pains to advise him properly. Employer's tardiness and default in making ROE immediately available despite claimant's best efforts. He did what a reasonable person would have done. [p.7]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
qualifying conditions |
a requirement |
|
Summary:
2 essential conditions: claimant must have been qualified on the prior day and good cause for delay must be shown to exist throughout the whole period. The onus of proving that both of these conditions have been met rests with claimant.
