Decision 12751

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 12751   Reed  English 1986-10-30
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  restrictions  specific employer 

Summary:

Laid off 11-4. Expected recall but did not know when. She thought she did not have to look for work while temporarily laid off. Required to seek temporary work. Recalled 12-7.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  legislative authority  purpose of ui system 

Summary:

Individuals assume that premiums give them a right to a return thereon. The UI system is not designed that way. Premiums are in the nature of another tax. The system is designed to pay unemployed individuals only in accordance with the rules set out in the Act.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work  applicability  necessary conditions 

Summary:

The benefit system is designed to pay unemployed individuals only in accordance with the rules set out in the Act. One of those rules is that the unemployed person must be actively looking for work. No one can alter this requirement.


Date modified: