Decision 12561
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 12561 | Strayer | English | 1986-09-25 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| earnings | rationale |
Summary:
Generally speaking, UI is designed to replace income from employment, and not to supplement it. The fact is that claimant was in receipt of income, namely vacation pay, equivalent to 3 weeks. By denying benefits, the law is simply carrying out this basic purpose.