Decision 12390

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 12390   Rouleau  French 1986-08-07
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Allowed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  regularly engaged  definition 

Summary:

Cites ABRAHAMS, ROY, COURNOYER and JACQUES. In this context, cannot conclude that employment not regular merely because temporary, whether part-time or full-time. Employed from 4 to 14-6 at Copak; agreed at outset that was not for fixed period but while waiting for machines. Accordingly, no firm commitment within meaning of ABRAHAMS. Irregular schedule: 29 hours one week and 16 the other. [pp. 18-19] Worked 8 hours per day and 5 days per week for 2 weeks. This gave him necessary continuity for him to be considered to be regularly employed. Intention of returning to position after strike changes nothing. No fraud. [p. 18]


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  regularly engaged  termination date 

Summary:

Employed from 13 to 27-7 by Agrinove [p. 2] and sought antedating to 13-6. I can grant this only as of 13-7, the date when he was hired by Agrinove. [p. 20]


Date modified: