| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
conditions required for disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
It was up to CEIC to prove initially that s. 31 applied: loss of employment because of work stoppage attributable to labour dispute where insured worked.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
settlement of dispute |
|
Summary:
Employees not recalled immediately after settlement of dispute. Clear that, according to emplyer, lay-off was attributable to dispute that had brought about decrease in orders. This is explanation board accepted.
