Decision 11544

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 11544   Jerome  English 1986-01-20
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
week of unemployment  minor in extent 

Summary:

Claimant argues that since he did not receive any remuneration from business which he treated as an investment, reg. 43(2) applies. I do not agree. Jurisprudence consistently holds that remuneration is only one factor in determining principal means of livelihood.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
penalties  business 

Summary:

Having made the legal and very technical determination that claimant was employed, the Board found statements made were false but failed to consider whether he knew. His evidence is he did not receive any remuneration from business regarded as investment. No attempt to conceal.


Date modified: