| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
stoppage of work |
premises |
|
Summary:
Service in cafeteria not needed during strike, so was advised the claimant's employer, a canteen operator, by the struck company and claimant was laid off. [question of premises not raised]
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| labour dispute |
participation |
picket lines |
|
Summary:
Service in cafeteria not needed during strike, so was advised the claimant's employer, a canteen operator, by struck company and claimant laid off. Even if claimant were thinking warm benedictions upon strikers, she can benefit of 31(2). You don't go tojail for what you think.
