| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
Summary:
It is argued that the disqualification under 28(1) cannot be served when a claimant has been disentitled for failing to comply with s.41. This argument is well founded.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
duration |
|
Summary:
Benefit period generally continues for 52 weeks. A claimant who finds employment is not entitled to receive UI while employed. But the benefit period is not thereby terminated; it continues to exist and may be reactivated later with no waiting period toserve.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
expiration |
|
Summary:
Reading 30(1) in that context makes it clear that a disqualification once imposed endures, during the life of the benefit period, until served regardless of whether disentitlement (for being employed) intervenes. Buttressed by 30(4) and (5).
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
address of normal place of residence |
change |
|
Summary:
On 1-4, claimant changed his address and informed the Commission. On 27-4, claimant went from Vancouver to Winnipeg and there is no evidence to support this change of address. As a result, disqualification for voluntary leaving not served upon filing renewal claim.
