Decision 11299
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 11299 | McNair | English | 1985-10-17 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| week of unemployment | real estate salespersons |
Summary:
Clear that the Board relied on reg. 37(5)(a) dealing with the situation where a person employed in real estate is deemed not to have an interruption of earnings. All agreed that this was not the correct reg. but instead reg. 43 applies.