Decision 10790

Case Number Claimant Judge Language Decision date
Decision 10790   Dubinsky  French 1985-07-16
Decision Appealed Appellant Corresponding Case
Dismissed  No N/A  -


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  rationale 

Summary:

UI Act has established valid and practical scheme to protect public against loss of income; must be protected by rules including rule dealing with labour disputes. Never intended to compensate for this type of loss.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees  rules of construction  intent and object 

Summary:

S. 11 of Interpretation Act requiring that enactment be given a fair, large and liberal interpretation provides assistance when ambiguity as to real meaning of a word or expression, not where text clear and unambiguous.


Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
labour dispute  regularly engaged  definition 

Summary:

Not regular: hired to perform specific task, to work for fixed period, that is, to finish harvest season, and she also worked on call. Work necessarily temporary and not regular.


Date modified: