| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
claim required |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0541.85
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
eligibility to benefits |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0541.85
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
types of claims |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0541.85
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
discretionary power waiver or variation of requirements |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0541.85
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
discretionary powers |
|
Summary:
Various judgments examined for a proper interpretation of the words "in the opinion of" a deciding authority. Note: this case, HARBOUR, was reviewed by the Federal Court who disagreed with the reasoning but agreed with the result.
