| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| umpires |
errors in law |
excess of jurisdiction |
|
Summary:
Umpire determined that the claimant was entitled to retain the overpayment on the basis that it arose by reason of inaccurate information provided by the Commission. Relying on the decision in Granger (S-0684.85), the Court stated that it was not open to the Umpire to refrain from applying the Act and waive the payment of amounts properly owing thereunder.
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to recover |
|
Summary:
Umpire determined that the claimant was entitled to retain the overpayment on the basis that it arose by reason of inaccurate information provided by the Commission. Relying on the decision in Granger (S-0684.85), the Court stated that it was not open to the Umpire to refrain from applying the Act and waive the payment of amounts properly owing thereunder.
