Decision 26895
| Case Number | Claimant | Judge | Language | Decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision 26895 | Urie | English | 1995-02-06 |
| Decision | Appealed | Appellant | Corresponding Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dismissed | No | N/A | - |
| Issue: | Sub-Issue 1: | Sub-Issue 2: | Sub-Issue 3: |
|---|---|---|---|
| umpires | grounds of appeal | capricious finding | meaning |
Summary:
The Board's task was to weigh the evidence and they chose to accept that of the claimant in preference to that of her employer. In doing so, it carried out the duty which was incumbent upon it to perform. It was neither a capricious nor perverse finding in light of the evidence they had heard.