Decision A-0258.79
Full Text of Decision A-0258.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
bonus |
recalling one to work |
|
Summary:
Difference between salary and UI paid by Simon Fraser University in B.C. following maternity leave. Because of the requirement for return to work and the object was to encourage return to work, the monies were properly allocated to the periods after claimant returned to work. In this case as well, the entitlement to the reimbursement arises upon return to work. As return to work is a condition precedent to payment, Hawkins applies. Return to work was a mere condition to which was subordinated claimant's right to be compensated for her maternity leave. This does not alter the fact that the payment was for the period of the leave.**NOTE: the same situation applies in the case of Amy S. Yu (A-0256.79) and Marie Susan Buchmann (A-0257.79).
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
wage-loss indemnity |
maternity |
|
Decision A-0256.79
Full Text of Decision A-0256.79
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
bonus |
recalling one to work |
|
Summary:
See summary indexed under the identical FCA case in Hawkins (A-0258.79, CUB 05512).
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| earnings |
wage-loss indemnity |
maternity |
|
