Summary of Issue: Definition

Decision 24644 Full Text of Decision 24644

Claimant refused to provide a residential address. He said he was entitled to privacy. He only provided a post office box number. The Board held that there was no intention to defraud. That was not the reason for disentitlement. He simply failed to provide his address in compliance with the statute.

Decision 22376 Full Text of Decision 22376

The mere furnishing of a post office box number or a telephone number of a relative through whom a claimant may be reached is not necessarily sufficient compliance with the statutory requirement for supplying the mailing address of a claimant's normal place of residence under ss.41(9): CUB_16912.

Decision 16912 Full Text of Decision 16912

A 3-month retroactive decision. Did not notify the authorities of his change of address because he received his mail in the same post office box and the telephone number provided was that of his brother, who could contact him. This does not suffice. The Act [subsection 41(9)] is very clear in this regard.