Decision 18989
Full Text of Decision 18989
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
weight of statements |
from spouse |
|
Summary:
Argument: the spouse was interviewed to determine her rights to UI, her communications with her husband were privileged and her statement not allowed in a court of law. MILLS is not a direct answer to whether spousal privilege should be recognized. Common law not applicable.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
conditions required |
7 days without work |
|
