Decision 40639
Full Text of Decision 40639
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
grievance pending |
|
Summary:
An appeal was filed on 15-10-96. Umpire ruled that if claimant intended to appeal the ruling reached by the Commission on 25-10-93 rejecting her claim for benefits she should have filed her appeal at that time. There was no need for claimant to wait for the termination of the arbitration proceedings to file an appeal. A ruling by the Commisssion will not be dependant upon or be governed by an arbitration award. An arbitration award will not determine how a decision ought to be made under the UI Act. Claimant has not demonstrated special reason to account for delay.
Decision A-1001.92
Full Text of Decision A-1001.92
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
grievance pending |
|
Summary:
As per the Umpire, Board's decision made without taking relevant considerations into account. Claimant was aware of his right of appeal but was not able to prove wrongful dismissal at that time. Arbitration ruling in his favour and reinstated 14 months later. The Umpire exceeded his jurisdiction.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
appealable |
time for appeal to bor |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
discretion of Commission |
time for appeal to bor |
Decision 21226
Full Text of Decision 21226
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
grievance pending |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1001.92
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
appealable |
time for appeal to bor |
| board of referees |
special reasons |
discretion of Commission |
time for appeal to bor |
