Decision 25419
Full Text of Decision 25419
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
length of hearing |
|
Summary:
The fact that an administrative body, faced with a busy schedule, quickly finishes a case with fairly routine facts does not create a breach of natural justice in and of itself. Provided claimant was given the opportunity to sufficiently present his case and be heard, there is no minimum time limit.
Decision A-0308.81
Full Text of Decision A-0308.81
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
length of hearing |
|
Summary:
It cannot be concluded that the board breached a principle of natural justice merely because it restricted the length of the hearing to 10 minutes, the appellant failed to submit evidence he was prepared to submit to the Umpire, or he was unable to cross-examine the employer, who was not called as a witness.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
right to cross-examine |
|
|
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
evidence new |
|
