Decision 30735
Full Text of Decision 30735
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
First notice of distribution sent 27-5-92. Appealed 12-6-92. Second notice send 16-6-92 and third notice sent 16-7-92. Possible revision pursuant to 43 and 86(A) if there are new facts, if the decision was made before an essential fact was known or if it is based on an error regarding this fact.
Decision 25169
Full Text of Decision 25169
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Voluntary leaving notice on 30-6-92. Appeal on 17-7-92. Notice changed to refusal of suitable employment on 3-8-92. The Board manifestly erred in law. The Commission could not invoke s. 86 to change a decision which was already pending an appeal (VON FINDENIGG and POULIN cited).
Decision A-0516.91
Full Text of Decision A-0516.91
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
What the Commission in effect is asking amounts to a statement that the judgment in VON FINDENIGG is no longer applicable and should not be followed. We cannot grant such a request inasmuch as we are not convinced that it is erroneous nor that the jurisprudence has reduced its binding effect.
Notice of refusal 10-5 based on refusal of work. Appeal to Board 3-6. Amended notice sent 17-6: voluntary leaving nullifies first notice and gives new right of appeal. Second notice held unacceptable: not authorized by s. 43 (no monies paid) nor 86. Judgment upheld by FC.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Decision 19688
Full Text of Decision 19688
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0516.91
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Decision 17695
Full Text of Decision 17695
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Notice of a decision on 9-7 stating misconduct; appeal to the Board on 22-7; notice amended on 28-7 stating voluntary termination of employment. I agree with VON FINDENIGG that an error by CEIC cannot be changed once the appeal has been lodged. 2nd notice was null and void.
Decision 14631
Full Text of Decision 14631
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Notice of disentitlement effective 29-1-86 issued 30-1-86; appeal filed 4-2-86; decision amended without new facts 13-2-86 effective 3-11-85 to correct the error. CEIC had no authority to amend the decision unless new facts were presented. Referred to the Board.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
statement of facts |
as a requirement |
|
Decision 14620
Full Text of Decision 14620
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Appeal against first denial; CEIC cannot amend the decision, add new grounds and state that the appeal will follow its course. No new facts; 41(10) not used, action beyond jurisdiction; examines VON FINDENIGG, CUB-11108 and 11250; referred to the Board.
Decision 13520
Full Text of Decision 13520
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Seamen's holiday. Decision relating to earnings was amended to hold not unemployed one month after insured appealed. Amended decision void and case referred back to CEIC for redetermination.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
correction to consider |
|
Decision 12780
Full Text of Decision 12780
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
The Commission must choose its grounds with care and be prepared to support them on appeal. It cannot switch to another in the middle of proceeding. Neither may the Board do this.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
error by board |
|
availability for work |
incompatible situations |
family obligations |
|
Decision 12631
Full Text of Decision 12631
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Notice sent 10-12 saying not unemployed. Appeal 10-1. Notice sent 16-1 saying no interruption of earnings. It is now well established that where the Commission has refused a claim on one ground and that refusal has been appealed, another ground cannot be invoked. See FINDENIGG.
Decision 12305
Full Text of Decision 12305
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Request for antedating renewal claim treated as if initial under s.9(4). The claimant appealed and the Commission amended the decision and relied on s.41(4). The Board had no jurisdiction to decide as it did, the decision was a nullity.
Decision T-2064.85
Full Text of Decision T-2064.85
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
Disqualified for voluntary leaving 6-5. Appeal filed 23-5. Amended notice showing misconduct sent 30-5. Board allows appeal regarding first notice and holds second notice as void. 3rd notice sent by CEIC showing misconduct. Writ of mandamus. Benefits to be paid under s. 87.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
decision of board |
implementation |
|
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
Decision 11108
Full Text of Decision 11108
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
The Commission argues that ss.43(1) is the remedy to VON FINDENIGG to amend a notice following appeal. Given the Commission's refusal, no benefits have yet been paid and so the cited provision has no application because it does not address the issue.
VON FINDENIGG referred to. In purporting to adjudicate upon those 2 nullities as if they were the subject of the appeal, the Board lost, or never acquired, jurisdiction. The Board must adjudicate an issue fully appreciated by the parties.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
claim procedure |
forms not received from Commission |
|
|
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
decision not to reconsider |
|
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
correction to consider |
|
Decision A-0737.82
Full Text of Decision A-0737.82
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
second notice a nullity |
|
Summary:
1st notice refers to reg. 39(a). Case upheld by Board under 39(b). 2nd notice refers to s.41 and is a nullity. The Umpire was correct in setting aside the Board's decision. However, to leave the matter there does not entitle claimant to benefit. 41(10) to be considered.
Once the appeal procedure is invoked it was too late for the Commission to exercise its authority under s.86, even though it does not expressly put any time limit. Otherwise a lower tribunal could intervene while the matter is pending before a higher court. [p.5]
As the Commission's refusal was under appeal when the 2nd notice was issued, the matter was out of the Commission's hands and the notice was a nullity. I take this view notwithstanding s.86. No new fact had been presented and no mistake as to a materialfact. [p.4]
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
claim procedure |
discretionary power waiver or variation of requirements |
|
|
board of referees |
issue not recognized |
correction to consider |
|