Decision 13092
Full Text of Decision 13092
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
hearings |
city |
|
Summary:
The claimant contends that she was not well served by having appeal heard in Hamilton. Board members not sensitive to local conditions of a community such as Bearskin Lake. This point is well taken. This is the reason for having local Boards hear appeals.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
natural justice |
defined |
|
