Decision 28736
Full Text of Decision 28736
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
appeal system |
shortcomings |
|
Summary:
What is more, to construct a system of appeals which holds out to individuals that they can appeal the Commission's decisions, first to the Board and then to an Umpire, when that holding out is in many, many cases an empty gesture is even more unfair.
High criticism expressed by Umpire due to so many restrictions and limitations placed on Umpires in hearing appeals relating to Commission's errors, penalties, disqualifications, Board's assessment of evidence, referrals to courses of study, self-employment assistance and labour adjustment benefits.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
self-employment assistance |
appeals |
no right of appeal |
|
Decision 13811
Full Text of Decision 13811
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
appeal system |
shortcomings |
|
Summary:
It is not the function of a Board or Umpire to decide the merits of a bitter dispute between employer and employee. Appeals by employers not to be encouraged. Whether justifiable grounds for getting rid of claimant not to be used to strengthen one's position before other courts.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
misconduct |
real reason for dismissal |
|
|
Decision 12752
Full Text of Decision 12752
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
appeal system |
shortcomings |
|
Summary:
People are often misled by Boards, officers or notices of refusal as to an Umpire's authority and appeal process. The statute does not allow the discretion which they are led to believe exists. There is a crying need for alteration in the type of information made available.