Summary of Issue: Multiple


Decision A-1692.92 Full Text of Decision A-1692.92

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification multiple
Summary:

Two refusals of employment leading to two statements of disqualification and one disentitlement. According to the umpire, disqualification and disentitlement cannot be imposed for the same reasons. Error in law, according to the Court. Disqualification and disentitlement relate to different realities and distinct regimes.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification and disentitlement
availability for work applicability relation with refusal of work

Decision 22116 Full Text of Decision 22116

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification multiple
Summary:

Refer to: A-1692.92

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification and disentitlement
availability for work applicability relation with refusal of work

Decision 17763 Full Text of Decision 17763

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification multiple
Summary:

Left 2 jobs, one on 5-5 and the second on 29-8. Disqualifications for two 3-week periods upheld.


Decision 12854 Full Text of Decision 12854

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification multiple
Summary:

Disqualified for 6 weeks in 11-85 for leaving voluntarily, 6 weeks in 1-86 for refusing employment and disentitled in 3-86 for non-availability.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
basic concepts disqualification and disentitlement
Date modified: