Decision A-1692.92
Full Text of Decision A-1692.92
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
multiple |
|
Summary:
Two refusals of employment leading to two statements of disqualification and one disentitlement. According to the umpire, disqualification and disentitlement cannot be imposed for the same reasons. Error in law, according to the Court. Disqualification and disentitlement relate to different realities and distinct regimes.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
| availability for work |
applicability |
relation with refusal of work |
|
Decision 22116
Full Text of Decision 22116
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
multiple |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1692.92
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
| availability for work |
applicability |
relation with refusal of work |
|
Decision 17763
Full Text of Decision 17763
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
multiple |
|
Summary:
Left 2 jobs, one on 5-5 and the second on 29-8. Disqualifications for two 3-week periods upheld.
Decision 12854
Full Text of Decision 12854
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification |
multiple |
|
Summary:
Disqualified for 6 weeks in 11-85 for leaving voluntarily, 6 weeks in 1-86 for refusing employment and disentitled in 3-86 for non-availability.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
disqualification and disentitlement |
|
|
