Decision 22831
Full Text of Decision 22831
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
postdating |
|
Summary:
The Board erred in allowing itself to be led to decide on the postdatation. The record does not even show that the Commission had handed down a decision on the application for postdating, which could have initiated the appeal process before the Board of Referess.
Decision 17732
Full Text of Decision 17732
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
postdating |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0084.90
Decision A-0084.90
Full Text of Decision A-0084.90
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
postdating |
|
Summary:
It was impossible for the Commission to delay the effective date of the claim made in 7-85 by postdating the commencement of the benefit period since the Act does not allow a benefit period to commence after the dates provided in ss. 9(1).
Decision 12304
Full Text of Decision 12304
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| basic concepts |
benefit periods |
postdating |
|
Summary:
She made a claim on 31-7 and said she was employed until 31-8. Therefore, she was making a prospective application for benefits. I can see no reason why the Commission should not have treated it as such. Benefit period commencement date ajusted retroactively under 9(1)(b).
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| teaching |
earnings |
summer months |
|
