Decision A-0024.01
Full Text of Decision A-0024.01
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
disentitlement period at issue |
earnings |
|
Summary:
The claimant, after being told that he would not be entitled to benefits and thus assuming that he did not have to file, delayed making his claim until the allocation of his severance pay had ended. The Court found that reliance on legal advice is not good cause. A claim for EI should be made immediately and not when an individual is payable.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
waiting for job |
searching for work |
|
Decision A-1261.83
Full Text of Decision A-1261.83
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
disentitlement period at issue |
earnings |
|
Summary:
Claimant ceased work in 9-80 and continued to receive monthly salary until 4-81. He learned later this was a retiring allowance and not earnings. Ignorance or mistake induced by employer's representations is not good cause as per PIROTTE.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
misinformation from third party |
|
|
| antedate |
ignorance of the law |
not an excuse |
|
| umpires |
grounds of appeal |
natural justice and error in law or in fact |
|
