Decision A-1049.88
Full Text of Decision A-1049.88
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
disentitlement period at issue |
availability |
|
Summary:
As per Umpire, once an antedate has been granted, the CEIC is not empowered to disentitle a claimant by reason of non-availability. This decision appears erroneous. Once an antedate has been granted, the CEIC must determine a claimant's eligibility.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
health reasons |
|
| availability for work |
applicability |
proof |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
not applying jurisprudence |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
availability concept |
|
Decision 15799
Full Text of Decision 15799
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
disentitlement period at issue |
availability |
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-1049.88
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| availability for work |
incompatible situations |
health reasons |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
not applying jurisprudence |
|
| board of referees |
errors in law |
availability concept |
|
| availability for work |
applicability |
proof |
|
Decision A-0175.87
Full Text of Decision A-0175.87
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
disentitlement period at issue |
availability |
|
Summary:
Antedate denied by Board because claimant was not available for work. It is trite law that what a Board or Umpire must deal with is the decision that the Commission made, not that which it might or should have made. Availability had nothing at all to do with antedating.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
error by board |
|
| antedate |
good cause |
test to apply |
|
