Summary of Issue: Availability


Decision A-1049.88 Full Text of Decision A-1049.88

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate disentitlement period at issue availability
Summary:

As per Umpire, once an antedate has been granted, the CEIC is not empowered to disentitle a claimant by reason of non-availability. This decision appears erroneous. Once an antedate has been granted, the CEIC must determine a claimant's eligibility.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work incompatible situations health reasons
availability for work applicability proof
board of referees errors in law not applying jurisprudence
board of referees errors in law availability concept

Decision 15799 Full Text of Decision 15799

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate disentitlement period at issue availability
Summary:

Refer to: A-1049.88

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
availability for work incompatible situations health reasons
board of referees errors in law not applying jurisprudence
board of referees errors in law availability concept
availability for work applicability proof

Decision A-0175.87 Full Text of Decision A-0175.87

summary
Issue: Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
antedate disentitlement period at issue availability
Summary:

Antedate denied by Board because claimant was not available for work. It is trite law that what a Board or Umpire must deal with is the decision that the Commission made, not that which it might or should have made. Availability had nothing at all to do with antedating.

other summary
Other Issue(s): Sub-Issue 1: Sub-Issue 2: Sub-Issue 3:
board of referees issue not recognized error by board
antedate good cause test to apply
Date modified: