Decision A-0371.93
Full Text of Decision A-0371.93
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
applicability |
implicit request |
|
Summary:
Issue of antedating raised before the Board but there was no such request before the CEIC. The Umpire erred in holding that, although there may not have been an express request, the CEIC implicitly dealt with the issue since it had to determine the commencement date of the benefit period.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
qualifying conditions |
a requirement |
|
| board of referees |
issue not recognized |
jurisdiction exceeded |
|
| umpires |
jurisdiction |
question not at issue |
|
Decision A-1191.88
Full Text of Decision A-1191.88
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| antedate |
applicability |
implicit request |
|
Summary:
He had not made his claim in 12-85 as it was his intention to do when he attended the office. The mere intention to do something can, in no circumstances, be equated to the doing of the thing. If the law clearly requires the doing of an act, the intention to do it is not enough.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| claim procedure |
applicability |
general |
|
| board of referees |
legislative authority |
acquired rights |
|
| earnings |
pension |
as income |
|
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
effective date of proviso |
|
| board of referees |
rules of construction |
intent and object |
|
