Decision 29511
Full Text of Decision 29511
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
meaning of working |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0697.95
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Decision A-0697.95
Full Text of Decision A-0697.95
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
meaning of working |
|
|
Summary:
Wrong in law to conclude that since payment to the claimant under the contract would be deferred until 1995, he could not be considered to be working during 1994 while performing that contract. Time of payment for work had no legal relevance as to whether the claimant was working.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
minor in extent |
|
|
Decision A-0802.85
Full Text of Decision A-0802.85
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
meaning of working |
|
|
Summary:
Where there is no question of self-employment, the test in CUB 5560 is correct: to be deemed to have worked for an employer, an employer-employee relationship is essential and this implies remuneration, direct or indirect, immediate or eventual, said the Umpire. FC substantially in agreement.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
business of a relative |
|
|
week of unemployment |
work without earnings |
|
|
Decision 11084
Full Text of Decision 11084
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
meaning of working |
|
|
Summary:
Refer to: A-0802.85
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
week of unemployment |
business of a relative |
|
|
week of unemployment |
work without earnings |
|
|