Decision 12344
Full Text of Decision 12344
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| week of unemployment |
hairdressing |
|
|
Summary:
Claimant was required to do a 40-hour week although she was not paid a wage, not even a minimum wage. On her cards she only recorded the number of hours that she performed a hair dressing service on a customer.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| reconsideration of claim |
overpayment |
authority to write off |
|
