Decision 28736
Full Text of Decision 28736
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| self-employment assistance |
appeals |
no right of appeal |
|
Summary:
Application for SEA submitted by claimant on 23-3. Had been told by CEIC staff that his benefit period was to expire 26-3. It actually expired 19-3. High criticism expressed by Umpire due to so many restrictions and limitations placed on appeals. Numerous CUBs examined to this end.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| board of referees |
appeal system |
shortcomings |
|
Decision 26228
Full Text of Decision 26228
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| self-employment assistance |
appeals |
no right of appeal |
|
Summary:
The Board acknowledged that the CEIC was correct in its view that it did not have authority to provide benefits under the program. That must be the end of the matter. Nothing permits to conclude that the CEIC ought to find accommodation for a claimant in such circumstances.
Decision 25213
Full Text of Decision 25213
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| self-employment assistance |
appeals |
no right of appeal |
|
Summary:
Approval for the self-assistance program could not be completed prior to the expiry of the benefit period. Claimant was notified that he was not eligible for the program. Held that the appeal is barred under ss. 26.1(2) and that an Umpire has no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| self-employment assistance |
qualified claimant |
definition |
|
