Decision A-0928.96
Full Text of Decision A-0928.96
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
number of disqualifications |
|
|
Summary:
Working on call, claimant refused employment on four occasions. Two seven-week disqualifications imposed. Thought that if she accepted a one-day replacement offer, she could lose a long-term replacement position if such an opening should arise. Even though she was informed to the contrary by the employer, claimant continued to refuse one-day replacements. Umpire determined that the employment was suitable and that the claimant was subject to disqualification for each refusal of work without just cause. Claimant's appeal summarily dismissed by the FCA.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
board of referees |
errors in law |
denial of natural justice |
|
refusal of work |
good cause |
|
|
Decision 19011
Full Text of Decision 19011
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
number of disqualifications |
|
|
Summary:
4 refusals at issue. 17 weeks was excessive in the circumstances. It seems unfair to present claimant with a number of vacancies for cleaning jobs, of which there are no doubt always plenty on the board, and then disqualify her consecutively for each ofthe positions.
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
wages or salary |
|
|
refusal of work |
warning prior to disentitlement |
|
|
Decision 12312
Full Text of Decision 12312
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
number of disqualifications |
|
|
Summary:
The claimant was disqualified for two 6-week periods because he, on two occasions, refused to apply for work [p. 1]. There is no indication of error in law. [p. 5]
Decision 12175
Full Text of Decision 12175
summary
Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
number of disqualifications |
|
|
Summary:
Refusal to attend interview to establish list of candidates for 2 positions does not constitute 2 refusals to apply for employment; there was only one. [p. 6]
other summary
Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
refusal of work |
wages or salary |
|
|
refusal of work |
refusal to apply |
|
|