Decision T779.18
Full Text of Decision T779.18
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| Social Security tribunal |
AD decision was reasonable |
|
|
Summary:
The Commission decided that the claimant received employment insurance benefits while he was unable to work and ordered him to repay benefits. The claimant did not challenge the decision according to the established procedure and time limits. The claimant was then late seeking to bring the matter before the General Division of the SST. The SST General Division denied the claimant's request for an extension of time.The claimant then sought leave to appeal the decision to the Appeal Division of the SST. The Appeal Division denied leave. It was determined that the Appeal Division made a reasonable decision when it denied leave to appeal. The application for judicial review was dismissed.
Decision T1500.15
Full Text of Decision T1500.15
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| Social Security tribunal |
AD decision was reasonable |
|
|
Summary:
The applicant, Mr. Patrick Daley, applied under section 18.1 of the Federal Courts Act, RSC, 1985, c F-7 for judicial review of a decision of the Social Security Tribunal—Appeal Division (SST-AD) dated July 24, 2015. The SST-AD dismissed Mr. Daley’s appeal of the decision of the Social Security Tribunal—General Division (SST-GD), which had refused his request for an extension of time to file a request for reconsideration under section 112 of the Employment Insurance Act, SC 1996, c 23 [EIA]. His application was not successful.
Decision T-297-16
Full Text of Decision T-297-16
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| Social Security tribunal |
AD decision was reasonable |
|
|
Summary:
This was an application for Judicial Review (JR) of a Social Security Tribunal (SST)-Appeal Division (AD) decision refusing the Applicant’s application for leave to appeal a SST-General Division (GD) decision. The SST-GD had confirmed the Canada Employment Insurance Commission (Commission) decision that the Applicant voluntarily left her employment without just cause (s. 30 Employment Insurance (EI) Act). The SST-AD concluded that since the Applicant did not raise any reviewable errors pertaining to the SST-GD decision, her appeal had no reasonable chance of success. The FC concluded the AD decision was reasonable despite that the new information, offered in a different forum, could have led to a different outcome.
