Decision 42735
Full Text of Decision 42735
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
professional athlete |
|
|
Summary:
BOR erred in law when it concluded that because the clmt, a football player, was not paid up until the termination date of his contract that he had an interruption of earnings when his salary was paid in full prior to that date. Although clmt had no duties to perform during part of his contract, he was remunerated up to the end of the contract.
Decision 22887
Full Text of Decision 22887
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
professional athlete |
|
|
Summary:
Hockey player; contract covers period of three years commencing 10-1-90. Traditionally, season begins on 10-1 and ends 3-31. Filed a claim for parental benefits on 4-91. Although the regular hockey season lasts only six months, it is obvious that contract remains in force during the whole year.
other summary
| Other Issue(s): |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| parental benefits |
professional athlete |
|
|
Decision 16774
Full Text of Decision 16774
summary
| Issue: |
Sub-Issue 1: |
Sub-Issue 2: |
Sub-Issue 3: |
| interruption of earnings |
professional athlete |
|
|
Summary:
Football player (Saskatchewan Roughriders) hired on an annual contract and paid during the football season after each scheduled game. No money paid to claimant during off-season. No interruption of earnings at any time during off-season from December toMay.
